Close Reading

The guy on the bike is a bigot, racist, insecure, and small-minded man! Talk about low IQ, he's the epitome! He clearly expresses how much he hates all Sub-Saharan Africans, but he does not know them all, yet lumps an entire continent of people in the same category. His stupidity, envy, and jealously will rot his bones

😂😂😂😂 sub-saharan Africans are the most intelligent people on earth dummy

Let's just say the basic premise. No one wants Indians, Muslims, or Sub-Saharan Africans in their country. No one. No matter what they say. what they may say.

The gentleman’s comment about the IQ levels of Sub-Saharan Africans was completely below the belt. Regardless, I believe such generalizations are harmful and unacceptable. Even though the statement was broad and generalized, I strongly object to it. In my view, it amounts to discrimination. I do not consider it intelligent or appropriate for anyone to make such remarks.

The Sub-Saharan African people are terrible. Not verbatim. I can't stop laughing! 😂

The Bike guy is spewing objectively false things about Africans using Richard Lynn IQ data which is disproven: Why "National IQ" Data is Fraudulent 1. The Data is Factually Fraudulent (Sample Bias) Richard Lynn did not use representative samples. For example, he famously assigned Equatorial Guinea an average IQ of 59 based on a group of children in a Spanish home for the developmentally disabled, then claimed that score represented the entire country. Peer-reviewed studies by researchers like Jelte Wicherts proved that Lynn systematically ignored higher-scoring African studies (some in the 80s and 90s) to keep his "averages" artificially low. If you judge a country’s intelligence by testing its hospitals and orphanages, you aren't a scientist—you're a fraud. 2. Nutrition is the "Hardware" of the Brain Intelligence cannot develop without biological fuel. As of 2026, roughly 30% of children in Sub-Saharan Africa suffer from stunting due to chronic malnutrition. Science proves that iodine and iron deficiencies alone can drop a population's IQ by 10–15 points. You aren't measuring "race"; you are measuring starvation. 3. The Education Gap (Abstract Reasoning) IQ tests do not measure "raw brain power." They measure Western-style schooling. Studies show that for every single year of formal education, a person’s IQ score increases by 1 to 5 points. Comparing the scores of people in countries with 30% literacy rates to people with PhDs in the West is like comparing the "athletic ability" of a runner to someone who has never been given shoes. 4. The "Age and War" Factor The median age in many African nations is under 20, compared to over 40 in Europe. These tests are often administered to children and adolescents in areas plagued by toxic stress from war and displacement. Peer-reviewed research confirms that trauma and PTSD physically impair the parts of the brain responsible for the logic puzzles found on IQ tests. 5. The Flynn Effect (The Death of the Racial Argument) If IQ were "innate" and "racial," it would never change. However, as nutrition and education improved in the West over the last 100 years, average IQ scores jumped by nearly 30 points. This is called the Flynn Effect. African scores are currently rising at the same rate as they develop. The "gap" is a development gap, not a genetic one. Conclusion: Using Richard Lynn’s data doesn't make you a "truth-teller"; it means you fell for a man so biased that his own university revoked his emeritus status for scientific or incompetence and racism. You are confusing privilege—access to food, safety, and a classroom—with innate ability.

The ignorant remarks towards sub-saharan Africans is wild. Says a lot about the guy's IQ

thanks to all the colonial generational wealth and benefits. It's like these people are returning the colonial favor by moving in by the millions. From former British/French/Dutch etc colonies. Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans will reclaim what has been taken from them, the stolen gold, the resources, slave labor and you cannot stop them. ????But it seems the Muslims are quicker & way more hostile about it and they were not English colonies.

I really appreciate your in-depth analysis of how unwelcome those countries can be, particularly, for sub-saharan African immigrants.\nLife for Africans in most of Asian and Gulf countries can be highly challenging.\nI do agree with you.

In addition the Canadian media keeps giving the impression that all immigrants in, & those trying to get into Canada are of sub-Saharan African origin. When in reality there is an overwhelming substantial amount of foreign immigrants in Canada of east-Indian descent.