Close Reading

i am an older white woman living in an apartment complex for people who have lost everything. i lost my entire $750k retirement. i have lived here for 10 years. the population is \n15% white women over 50 \n10% black women over 50, \n5% white men under 50 \n2% white women under 50\n3% black women under 50 \n65% black men under 50\ni have been sick so i havent been out of my apartment. but i am concerned. i dont know many people. the ones i know accept and know me as i am know to not be concerned \nbut i am afraid when i leave here, people are going to look for my prejudice based on current events\nthat test sounds like it will make you sound prejudiced. thats a loaded question\nDo you believe black as can have it as good as whites if they try harder\nhow do you answer that without sounding bad\nyes i believe that is true - definitely a bad answer\nno i dont think thats true sounds like i dont think blacks can have it as good. \ni worked for BDMi in Houston\nfor 4 yearsa not one bl;ack was hired because the original partner, retired who owned the building would not permit it.\nit was blatant\nafter 4 years i had it, i reported it to the eeoc people, they said they couldnt do anything. nothing happened except i was 'let go'c

For the shopping experience, they have the guys go in carrying hand bags. That's going to get their attention since shoplifters could easily put things into the bags and most people don't bring computer bags, hand bags etc when they shop.\n\nI've had instances where people were awful to me for no apparent reason (I'm white), and it struck me that if i was black, I would attribute the terrible treatment to racism since I couldn't think of any other reason for the bad treatment. \n\nAnother form of racism not covered here is the racism of low expectations. If people assume that you are too dumb to understand something or too poor to afford something, that's wrong. Same holds true for treating women as if they won't understand. Usually this behavior is done, not by bad people, but by people who just haven't had a lot of interactions with different people of different races. So they haven't had the chance to have those stereotypes personally disproven.

Other women dress the way they want but when Muslim women do it, there seems to be an issue smh. Imagine telling someone how to dress. I hold my Creators commandments as absolute why would I care about Steve or Bobs thinks. Ya'll opinions are like pencils.......pointless.

My son worked at Superstore and he said it was 90% Natives stealing and being caught for shoplifting. Women with carts full of groceries surrounded by little kids as shields trying to walk out without paying. And when they were stopped they shouted “racism”! You make your own bed, ppl don’t get these “prejudices” from thin air. And I wonder what those little kids watching their parents steal will do?...give me a break snowflakes! And I wonder what faces the black guy would prefer? A Chinese store owner will watch the black guy and the native too, are the Chinese racists??

Has anyone given a thought how ISIS had their women dressed and if this is the example we want for muslim women in the West or Christian Countries? I would respect those who follow Islam if men were to cover up also but no only women? Please watch the following videos and LEARN SOMETHING : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE46XLnOURY / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbbAQoc5-B4 / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXBgqa-xQwY&t=76s / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NXtIUv5i2w

I think women who wear hijab and Niqab are hot. I would love to have a gf or wife who would dress like that in public. At home she can just wear the hijab and niqab and nothing else.

I used to feel sorry for these brainwashed women but right now I just want them gone. all of these islamic fanatics gone. world would be a much better place

Muslim women will be safe from men who only make appearance as the most important thing before marriage. and a Muslim man is very lucky that they do not have to worry because no mischievous man would interfere with his wife .. this is how Islam protects the dignity of a woman... true love come from your heart..

Psychology student here. In the interest of accurate information, I would like to point out some flaws I find with some of the studies in this documentary and question the conclusions reached. I understand that CBC Marketplace are not personality psychologists and therefore cannot be expected to produce the same quality of work as a scientist. However, I think it is worthwhile to think critically about the information in the media that we consume. I am also open to anyone who wants to engage in debating the contents of this documentary.\n\n\nThe following are some notes I took while watching the documentary outlining the individual hypotheses of the studies I think are flawed and descriptions of their respective accompanying errors. \n\n\nThere are three possible research questions, and thereby dependent variables, being answered by the apartment hunting studies.\n1. If there is no discrimination between the white man and the first-nations man, then they should get equal treatment, including quotes and availability, when apartment hunting. \na. Could the gender of the landlord be a confounding variable (perhaps men are more discriminatory than women)? \n \n2. If there is no discrimination between the white man and the first-nations man between Toronto, Montreal, Regina, and Victoria, then they should get equal treatment, including quotes and availability, when apartment hunting. \na. Could total apartments visited be a confounding variable? (4 in Toronto, 3 in Montreal, Regina, and Victoria) \nb. Could the gender of the landlord be a confounding variable (perhaps men are more discriminatory than women)? \nc. They only showed the black man apartment hunting in some of the trials. I am considering him out of the study for consistency purposes. The first-nations man is the only one who got unfair treatment in the footage of apartment hunting. \n \n3. Possible hypothesis: If male landlords/agents are more discriminatory than female landlords/agents, then the white man and the first-nations man will get different treatment at different Canadian apartments in equally diverse cities. \na. Don’t know all the information about the genders of the landlords/agents, not all the footage is shown, but the ones where they get ripped off are male. The others shown are female. The remaining interactions are not shown.\n\n\nThere are also some factors that may have influenced the racial bias survey and, in my estimation, rendered it scientifically unreliable.\n\n\n1. The bias survey and accompanying tests at the CBC attributed the differences between the studies to unconscious racism. What if it was just due to familiarity with certain racial groups over others? \na. The black participants had no bias between European-American and African Americans, supposedly indicating no racism, while the white and first-nations participants did, supposedly indicating racism. Is it possible that another interpretation of this result is that bias is a function of familiarity: that we are comfortable with the majority demographic in the geographical location we live in, as well as our own kind. Therefore, the black guys are less biased against black people due to being both black and living in a white majority demographic? \nb. The participants took the survey knowing the objectives of the researchers was to study racial discrimination. They might have influenced the answers they gave \nc. Whether the participants agreed with identity politics or not was a confounding factor that was not controlled . You can only be racially unbiased biased if you think that racial identity is a means of accurately viewing the world. People who do not believe in the existence of identity politics may answer the questions quite differently, which could be a different reason for the results.\nd. I took the study myself. The words that participants were required to match were a mix of adjectives and nouns. It is known within psychology that nouns have higher levels of imagery. This was not properly controlled and therefore is another confounding variable. \n \nAll the other studies looked fine to me. I welcome any discussion on my observations.

When women say i chose to wear it im sure its because of peer pressure or family or religion even, imagine a world with no religions at all, if you ask women to wear such thing i don't think any of them would agree

Ha ha try that shit in Ireland the Irish women would fuck them up

It be better if the face was not covered. Its creates undo fear. It creates security issues. It creates issues with ID. We live in a time of hyper sensitivity to any reference to men and women being different. Islam doesn't bend to social trends, and this upsets people. I just wish feminist and politians would let women choose for themselves. I wish people who passionately oppose Islam would equally try to understand Islam.

I don’t know what’s problem with non muslims these days do they tell there women to dress according to their satisfaction in islam wearing or not wearing hijab doesn’t make you a good muslim nor a bad muslim at the day of judgement your good deeds will be counted not if she wore a hijab or she didn’t \nWhat if this person implements that every women should cover there bodies and makes wearing shorts banned in Canada so wouldn’t you all be offended and protest against that and would say that we want freedom of expression \nSo we should respect everybody’s culture and religion

I would love to see this program in some countries of the Middle East conducting the same experiment. \nIt would be great to see how welcoming the East is to Gays, lesbians and just plain ol' black & white women dressed as what we consider to be conservative.

My problem with women covering their faces is that that men are not allowed by law to cover their faces, so why would a certain group of women have this right. Women SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN A HIGHER STATUS because we should be EQUAL to men. People easily use freedom of choice as an argument to defend every single thing they do. I WISH, I WISH, I WISH they would advocate for freedom of choice in their country of origin. I wish they would fight for human rights the way they do when they come to the Western World. And saying that covering your face doesn't define you is complete bulls*** because when we ask you to take it off suddenly it becomes who you are as a person. As a Canadian Christian woman of Lebanese origin (second-generation immigrant), I love everyone... jews, muslims, hindus, ... you name it. But what I don't like is HYPOCRITES.

Well I think they're many women that are forced to be muslim, I remember how I was smoking joints with a girl who wears a hidschab and she told us that her father would beat her if she didn't.

Trudeau is a MURDERER! VOTE ANDREW SCHEER AND GET TRUDEAU OUT!!!!!!!! MUSLIMS FRIGHTENED THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS OUT OF CANADIANS WHEN TRUDEAU BROUGHT THIS LOT IN! NOW THE TABLES ARE TURNED THEY GAVE THE NERVE TO BE WORRIED!!!!!!! THEY SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN LET IN. CANADA IS NOT THE SAME COUNTRY ANYMORE!!!!! Why not live in a Muslim country where their religion and culture is theirs!!!!!!!! In a muslim country Christian's would not be allowed to practice their religion or wear their own clothing! Bulldust the women have to cover their faces as their MEN INSIST they look unattractive to men outside the home!! It is a chauvinistic religion and men do not accept women as equals and are expected to be subservient!

The prophet Mohammed himself would have fallen foul of sharia since he drank alcohol, wore women's clothing, had more than 4 wives and had sex with girls and boys.

The first white women to stand up would have dreads

I would like to see a video where a white women would try and collect money for a Christian charity in a Muslim community

If the Pope would ask women to hide their face, i can't imagine the tsunami of whining and protests. This veil is nothing but a shame, it's dark ages coming back.

That happened to me when I went to Target in California and I went in to pay my bill there. I was followed by people and I notice that there was some other than my race stealing while they were following me.\nAlso, my sister applied for a teaching\nJob and she put down she was Caucasian instead of African American; she went on the interview and got the job.\nBut me my name the person would come out and call my name then look at all the women that were Caucasian waiting to be interviewed.\nWhen I would stand up the interviewer would have the funniest look on her/his face then will ask again you are and say my name again.

The burka that these so call women wear. Are very un Canadian. There is nothing Canadian about it. I would not believe anything that they say about being attacked. Too many b.s.ers on this, saying they have been attacked. It's a known fact that they lie about it. I will never ever help one if she is in distress either. Sorry but if you can't show your face then you aren't worth me fighting to save. Funny though every country these people go to, they create division and stress, fear and anger. No other political religion of this era does that. Why is it that these muslims don't choose to stay in any muslim countries (50plus) in the world. But continue to go to western countries. They certainly don't like to fit in. They seem to change the rules of Western countries to fit their narratives and agendas. And where ever they do go problems follow. Never seen this before with any other human race. That's probably a big reason why our forefathers never let them into the country to begin with. My thoughts only. Peace out.

THE EXPERIMENT SHOULD HAVE BEING DONE WITH AN ACTOR POSING AS A SYRIAN MAN ASKING FOR ALMS, ASSISTANCE, OR MONEY...THAT WAY THE TRUE OUTCOME OF THE EXPERIMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN REALIZED, BECAUSE WITH WOMEN, WOMEN BLINDLY HAVE A THING FOR OTHER WOMEN OR SAME GENDER.....WHETHER RIGHT OR WRONG....

I don't like violence, but if there was any time in human history, any reason for building an atomic bomb - throwing it on Muslim countries would need no excuse.\nThose women are delusional - living a life in Canada and talking about wearing head covers like it is a fashion discussion and looking for trouble. This has no comparison to what those poor Muslim women in Muslim countries are going through - forcefully married, and owned without any rights: acid attacks, beatings, circumcisions, humiliations, etc.

Can anyone answer the question, for most western men, practice of sharia law actually significantly benefit men more and put women, LGBT in disadvantaged position. Then why would western men want to protect the western feminist progressive liberal women from sharia law?

We should all be three men and women to travel the planet we were born upon, freely & without hassle. \nA lot of times the laws actually make things worse. Like drugs. We would not have the addiction rates, all of the murders and everything else if they were legalized. Or even just here in the United States ??

Newton's third law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.\n\nBefore 9/11, it was so rare to see young Muslim women in hijaab or niqaab, or young Muslim men donning a beard. But, 9/11 changed all that. 9/11 was manufactured by traitors headed by GWB to destroy Islam and tarnish Muslims. Yet, it seems that 9/11 had the exact opposite response than what it was meant to elicit. Because 9/11 challenged the very identity and existence of Muslims, it provoked them into upping their game and making religion a center piece of who they were. So today's hyper-islamization in the West and across the globe is largely a by-product of 9/11 and the unethical immoral wars that followed and destroyed millions of innocent lives. For Islam, 9/11 was the best advert it could have had. Yet, Islam and Muslims had nothing to do with 9/11. \n\nRather than wasting its resources on Trumpgate, the FBI ought to be looking to incriminate Americans who masterminded the 9/11 to reshape the world. The plot went terribly wrong. Not only the ensuing wars (that we are fighting to this day) bankrupted America but we also lost our credibility as a beacon of hope. Before 9/11, our national debt was a meagre $2T. Today, it stands at a whopping $22T!! Nearly 50% of that is the result of cost of wars. It is time we ought to do our own soul-searching rather than make Islam a scapegoat of our problems for religions have always conquered civilizations from the dawn of human history. \n\nNearly 2000 years ago, Europe was largely pagan. And within a couple of centuries, it predominantly became a Christian continent even though Christianity at first was met with a lot of suspicion and mistrust among the pagans. Islam is now at a similar crossroad in the Western hemisphere. Should Isam replace Christianity in the West over the next couple of centuries (and it seems likely that it will), it would only mark the natural evolution of human culture and civilization. And does it matter what religion people follow in Europe or America? No. The French will still be French whether they worship God in a mosque or church. And ditto for the Brits, Germans, Italians, and others. But, the French will always play the most entertaining le foot -- Nous sommes les champions du monde! Allez les Blues!\n\nEn conclusion:\nLa religion est importante pour la survie de la race humaine.\nAvec la religion, vous vivez.\nSans religion, vous mourez.\nVoila les lois de biologie!

She's The Kind A Women That Would Push A Pull Door

so...I don't get it...if you love Islam, and it's practices, why would you leave your islamic country of origin? You all are lucky that you have the freedom to wear what you want in Canada or America...Western women would be forbidden to wear shorts or capri pants in your country...why should we understand your dress code with empathy, but not be afforded the same in your part of the world?

Those women masks are so distracting and creepy looking. At least show your face muslim women. Only people with bad intentions or hiding some disabilities on their faces would cover their face like that in a western or free society. You can have more dignity by assimilating to the western world or you might prefer being rejected and segregated.

Perhaps a closer reading of the Qu'ran...especially the section on Women would be essential here... ?

Ps lady you are thought of by the males of your cult think you are lower than a dog. Just watch the tapes and when complaining about the free food given by the Europeans. He said he wouldn't eat it his dog wouldn't eat it its food for women. I would feel sorry for you but you are becoming a terrible threat to our Constitution and bill of rights.

Nowhere in the Koran does it say that women should cover their hair . It does however say it in the Christian Bible. The Burqa was originally worn by prostitutes. Pre Islam of course, but why would they want to be associated with it?

LMAO LMAO.....I can't stop laughing about her comment on paying taxes. Is she that stupid??? Being drunk is just an excuse, she is sorry racist pityful excuse for a human being. What an example for her children to behave that way. Her kids must be ashamed and disappointed in how she behaved..I would be if my mother behaved that way in public. Kudos to the company and boss who fired her. She should be charged for threats and assault. C'mon women, let's be classy and behave like ladies, ...clearly she comes off uneducated, unruly, narrow minded, have no knowledge of the outside world at all. Someone should wash her mouth with diesel or something.....it is very foul and laughable. I don't think she will be very employable person with that kind of attitude and behavior. NOT ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR IN ALBERTA, QUEBEC, CANADA, OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY KELLY POCHA - AND I AM WRITING IT IN ENGLISH!

Is it “trying his best” when a man has 6-7 children by 6-7 women?!?\nI call that totally irresponsible.\nNo one would try to make up such an excuse for a woman who has 6-7 children by 6-7 men.

I don't know why the hijab gets people so angry. No one freaks out about Amish women or nuns covering their hair. Why is this any different? We all wear clothes (most of us) so why is the amount of clothing a person wears such a big deal? Just as some Christian women would find it inappropriate to leave the house in short shorts and a crop top, some Muslim women find it inappropriate to leave the house with their hair showing. No big deal.

Look,lets all be honest ,we have all seen some young women dressing up as good time girls, giving off false signals, and we have thought OR quietly commented on how their parents would not be proud of them.And alcohol speaks for itself when intake of it is excelled.\nBut, Nobody should parade streets/ areas acting as lawmakers and tell people what to do. We cannot have this here in britain .

iT WOULD BE FUNNY TO SEE WOMEN GOING AROUND WITH NOSE BAGS ON,WHATS IN THEM OATS IT IS PATHETIC.

It’s literally the definition of anti-women and discrimination. Your forced to wear a thick peace of black cloth around your face (hiding it, including the rest of her body) in some of the hottest places on earth. Your not only forced to wear it but also have all your rights token away. The fact that u as a women can stand their and defend Islam is just pure ignorance let alone stupidity and brainwashed. You would think they would stand up for the rights of women in the Middle East but instead try to force this ideology on ppl in other countries instead of even trying to fix/help their own which they r so proud of ¿? Wake up people

If the Bible was divinely inspired, then why would it have so many really obvious contradictions?\nTheological doctrines:\n1. God is satisfied with his works\nGen 1:31\nGod is dissatisfied with his works.\nGen 6:6\n2. God dwells in chosen temples\n2 Chron 7:12,16\nGod dwells not in temples\nActs 7:48\n3. God dwells in light\nTim 6:16\nGod dwells in darkness\n1 Kings 8:12/ Ps 18:11/ Ps 97:2\n4. God is seen and heard\nEx 33:23/ Ex 33:11/ Gen 3:9,10/ Gen 32:30/ Is 6:1/\nEx 24:9-11\nGod is invisible and cannot be heard\nJohn 1:18/ John 5:37/ Ex 33:20/ 1 Tim 6:16\n5. God is tired and rests\nEx 31:17\nGod is never tired and never rests\nIs 40:28\n6. God is everywhere present, sees and knows all things\nProv 15:3/ Ps 139:7-10/ Job 34:22,21\nGod is not everywhere present, neither sees nor knows all\nthings\nGen 11:5/ Gen 18:20,21/ Gen 3:8\n7. God knows the hearts of men\nActs 1:24/ Ps 139:2,3\nGod tries men to find out what is in their heart\nDeut 13:3/ Deut 8:2/ Gen 22:12\n8. God is all powerful\nJer 32:27/ Matt 19:26\nGod is not all powerful\nJudg 1:19\n9. God is unchangeable\nJames 1:17/ Mal 3:6/ Ezek 24:14/ Num 23:19\nGod is changeable\nGen 6:6/ Jonah 3:10/ 1 Sam 2:30,31/ 2 Kings 20:1,4,5,6/\nEx 33:1,3,17,14\n10. God is just and impartial\nPs 92:15/ Gen 18:25/ Deut 32:4/ Rom 2:11/ Ezek 18:25\nGod is unjust and partial\nGen 9:25/ Ex 20:5/ Rom 9:11-13/ Matt 13:12\n11. God is the author of evil\nLam 3:38/ Jer 18:11/ Is 45:7/ Amos 3:6/ Ezek 20:25\nGod is not the author of evil\n1 Cor 14:33/ Deut 32:4/ James 1:13\n12. God gives freely to those who ask\nJames 1:5/ Luke 11:10\nGod withholds his blessings and prevents men from receiving\nthem\nJohn 12:40/ Josh 11:20/ Is 63:17\n13. God is to be found by those who seek him\nMatt 7:8/ Prov 8:17\nGod is not to be found by those who seek him\nProv 1:28\n14. God is warlike\nEx 15:3/ Is 51:15\nGod is peaceful\nRom 15:33/ 1 Cor 14:33\n15. God is cruel, unmerciful, destructive, and ferocious\nJer 13:14/ Deut 7:16/ 1 Sam 15:2,3/ 1 Sam 6:19\nGod is kind, merciful, and good\nJames 5:11/ Lam 3:33/ 1 Chron 16:34/ Ezek 18:32/ Ps 145:9/\n1 Tim 2:4/ 1 John 4:16/ Ps 25:8\n16. God's anger is fierce and endures long\nNum 32:13/ Num 25:4/ Jer 17:4\nGod's anger is slow and endures but for a minute\nPs 103:8/ Ps 30:5\n17. God commands, approves of, and delights in burnt offerings,\nsacrifices ,and holy days\nEx 29:36/ Lev 23:27/ Ex 29:18/ Lev 1:9\nGod disapproves of and has no pleasure in burnt offerings,\nsacrifices, and holy days.\nJer 7:22/ Jer 6:20/ Ps 50:13,4/ Is 1:13,11,12\n18. God accepts human sacrifices\n2 Sam 21:8,9,14/ Gen 22:2/ Judg 11:30-32,34,38,39\nGod forbids human sacrifice\nDeut 12:30,31\n19. God tempts men\nGen 22:1/ 2 Sam 24:1/ Jer 20:7/ Matt 6:13\nGod tempts no man\nJames 1:13\n20. God cannot lie\nHeb 6:18\nGod lies by proxy; he sends forth lying spirits t deceive\n2 Thes 2:11/ 1 Kings 22:23/ Ezek 14:9\n21. Because of man's wickedness God destroys him\nGen 6:5,7\nBecause of man's wickedness God will not destroy him\nGen 8:21\n22. God's attributes are revealed in his works.\nRom 1:20\nGod's attributes cannot be discovered\nJob 11:7/ Is 40:28\n23. There is but one God\nDeut 6:4\nThere is a plurality of gods\nGen 1:26/ Gen 3:22/ Gen 18:1-3/ 1 John 5:7\nMoral Precepts\n24. Robbery commanded\nEx 3:21,22/ Ex 12:35,36\nRobbery forbidden\nLev 19:13/ Ex 20:15\n25. Lying approved and sanctioned\nJosh 2:4-6/ James 2:25/ Ex 1:18-20/ 1 Kings 22:21,22\nLying forbidden\nEx 20:16/ Prov 12:22/ Rev 21:8\n26. Hatred to the Edomite sanctioned\n2 Kings 14:7,3\nHatred to the Edomite forbidden\nDeut 23:7\n27. Killing commanded\nEx 32:27\nKilling forbidden\nEx 20:13\n28. The blood-shedder must die\nGen 9:5,6\nThe blood-shedder must not die\nGen 4:15\n29. The making of images forbidden\nEx 20:4\nThe making of images commanded\nEx 25:18,20\n30. Slavery and oppression ordained\nGen 9:25/ Lev 25:45,46/ Joel 3:8\nSlavery and oppression forbidden\nIs 58:6/ Ex 22:21/ Ex 21:16/ Matt 23:10\n31. Improvidence enjoyed\nMatt 6:28,31,34/ Luke 6:30,35/ Luke 12:3\nImprovidence condemned\n1 Tim 5:8/ Prov 13:22\n32. Anger approved\nEph 4:26\nAnger disapproved\nEccl 7:9/ Prov 22:24/ James 1:20\n33. Good works to be seen of men\nMatt 5:16\nGood works not to be seen of men\nMatt 6:1\n34. Judging of others forbidden\nMatt 7:1,2\nJudging of others approved\n1 Cor 6:2-4/ 1 Cor 5:12\n35. Christ taught non-resistance\nMatt 5:39/ Matt 26:52\nChrist taught and practiced physical resistance\nLuke 22:36/ John 2:15\n36. Christ warned his followers not to fear being killed\nLuke 12:4\nChrist himself avoided the Jews for fear of being killed\nJohn 7:1\n37. Public prayer sanctioned\n1 Kings 8:22,54, 9:3\nPublic prayer disapproved\nMatt 6:5,6\n38. Importunity in prayer commended\nLuke 18:5,7\nImportunity in prayer condemned\nMatt 6:7,8\n39. The wearing of long hair by men sanctioned\nJudg 13:5/ Num 6:5\nThe wearing of long hair by men condemned\n1 Cor 11:14\n40. Circumcision instituted\nGen 17:10\nCircumcision condemned\nGal 5:2\n41. The Sabbath instituted\nEx 20:8\nThe Sabbath repudiated\nIs 1:13/ Rom 14:5/ Col 2:16\n42. The Sabbath instituted because God rested on the seventh day\nEx 20:11\nThe Sabbath instituted because God brought the Israelites\nout of Egypt\nDeut 5:15\n43. No work to be done on the Sabbath under penalty of death\nEx 31:15/ Num 15:32,36\nJesus Christ broke the Sabbath and justified his disciples in\nthe same\nJohn 5:16/ Matt 12:1-3,5\n44. Baptism commanded\nMatt 28:19\nBaptism not commanded\n1 Cor 1:17,14\n45. Every kind of animal allowed for food.\nGen 9:3/ 1 Cor 10:25/ Rom 14:14\nCertain kinds of animals prohibited for food.\nDeut 14:7,8\n46. Taking of oaths sanctioned\nNum 30:2/ Gen 21:23-24,31/ Gen 31:53/ Heb 6:13\nTaking of oaths forbidden\nMatt 5:34\n47. Marriage approved\nGen 2:18/ Gen 1:28/ Matt 19:5/ Heb 13:4\nMarriage disapproved\n1 Cor 7:1/ 1 Cor 7:7,8\n48. Freedom of divorce permitted\nDeut 24:1/ Deut 21:10,11,14\nDivorce restricted\nMatt 5:32\n49. Adultery forbidden\nEx 20:14/ Heb 13:4\nAdultery allowed\nNum 31:18/ Hos 1:2; 2:1-3\n50. Marriage or cohabitation with a sister denounced\nDeut 27:22/ Lev 20:17\nAbraham married his sister and God blessed the union\nGen 20:11,12/ Gen 17:16\n51. A man may marry his brother's widow\nDeut 25:5\nA man may not marry his brother's widow\nLev 20:21\n52. Hatred to kindred enjoined\nLuke 14:26\nHatred to kindred condemned\nEph 6:2/ Eph 5:25,29\n53. Intoxicating beverages recommended\nProv 31:6,7/ 1 Tim 5:23/ Ps 104:15\nIntoxicating beverages discountenanced\nProv 20:1/ Prov 23:31,32\n54. It is our duty to obey our rulers, who are God's ministers\nand punish evil doers only\nRom 13:1-3,6\nIt is not our duty to obey rulers, who sometimes punish the\ngood and receive unto themselves damnation therefor\nEx 1:17,20/ Dan 3:16,18/ Dan 6:9,7,10/ Acts 4:26,27/\nMark 12:38,39,40/ Luke 23:11,24,33,35\n55. Women's rights denied\nGen 3:16/ 1 Tim 2:12/ 1 Cor 14:34/ 1 Pet 3:6\nWomen's rights affirmed\nJudg 4:4,14,15/ ...CHRISTIANITY IS AMAN MADE RELIGION AND THE AUTHOR IS PAUL WHO DIVERTED THE TEACHING OF JESUS(PBUH) BY TEACHING TRINITY WHICH IS NOWHERE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.......ISLAM(SUBMITTING YOUR WILL TO GOD) IS THE WAY

If wearing a nikab or hijab or burka was a sign of respect and honor, we would all be walking around wearing bed sheets over our heads. That fact that only women are required to cover up is exactly why it is discriminating and a sign of male chauvinism by the muslim community and islam. Having grown up in the midwest of the USA, I find it offensive and oppressive to women to see them hiding under or behind a cloth garment. Talk to anyone who specializes in communication and you will quickly understand that there are many non-verbal communications from facial expressions that contribute to the way we humans communicate with each other. To suppress these facial expressions is like seeing without color and in black and white only. This is a fact of life and not open to debate.

Call me whatever, but India has been dealing with this for a very long time, probably since 1980s. I dont hate islam but I dont love it either. Let's just say that I wouldnt buy a house in Muslim neighborhood. It has been a nuisance to India since a long time, every time we screamed in UN for help. We got shut down until the problem reached world wide. People say it started happening since Iraq and syrian war which is slightly incorrect. This problem has been there since ages prior to war, It just manifested on a high level recently. There are so many examples...This religion feeling which later turns into violence starts with your own house, your upbringing and your own values. If a kid is used to seeing his mom being suppressed then when he grows up, dont expect much from him. Now every community has this issue but in Muslim community it is engraved in you the moment you open your eyes on planet earth. You cannot defend the argument when someone says Women are suppressed in mulsim culture. The most hurtful thing happening is in UK. A country which gave you food, shelter, respect, a better life. You are trying to impose your values on it? As a matter of fact, good muslims should come out openly and boycott these terrorist who are trying to create chaos if they really want to show good intentions but you wont see any (for obvious reasons). They often cry about they being a victim but what about other people?? If all good muslim come out and boycott bad muslims then that would be a thing to appreciate and notice. In last you cant clap with one hand! Remember that.

Why would any woman voluntarily convert to Islam? Listening to these women makes me sick. We should video tape them being stoned or flogged for being rape victims and accused of adultery. Let CNN be a witness to the peaceful resolution sharia law has towards rape victims and adulterers.

So men can wear balaclava's anywhere in public, I wonder how safe women would feel if a group of men walked towards them in the street with a face covering, the reason is the public knows a face covering allows the wearer to act with some impunity, as facial recognition software and camera surveillance is rendered useless, witness identification and testimony is also useless, this puts people on edge.

Regarding the girl who received less while wearing the veil than when wearing nothing/ a hijab: Don't get me wrong the things some poeple said to her were horrible, but i think its just natural that someone would be more willing to donate to someone whose face is clearly visible as they could be more sympathetic towards them based on their expressions and such. After all, would you donate to someone who was wearing a hockey mask or a balaclava? (I'm not implying that these are in any way the same, but remember that the Qaran does not state that they have to wear a full veil, just some food for thought). Some may argue that this intrudes on basic human facial expressions to one another.) Not only can people feel uneasy when they see someone in a burqa, but it can also be dangerous to the very person underneath it. The burqa isolates women from others and can hide evidence of abuse or assault. It advocates segregation of muslim women in public, which is blatant discrimination within itself, whichever way you look at it!!!

Follow our laws & traditions or GET OUT!! Don't expect us to follow your laws & traditions when we go to your countries!! When people go to an islamic country they are expected to follow the islamic laws (eg. women are expected to wear a table cloth on their head - ludicrous!!). Yet the same is NOT respected for American laws - muslims do NOT respect our traditions or they would take off the bed sheets & table cloths while they are in our countries (as we wear them for you in yours). It's only fair. If you don't like it then go back to your country and bring your creepy traditions with you. Women walking around in America with bed sheets look CREEPY and oppressed, whether you say you want to wear your table cloth or not, you still look OUT OF PLACE and MAKE yourself a minority. You segregate YOURSELVES. America is NOT interested in becoming a muslim country at ALL!!!! Follow our laws & traditions or GET OUT or don't expect us to follow your laws & traditions when we go to your countries!!

They come to our country and refuse to accept our cultural beliefs one is that anyone covering their nose & mouth we see as a threat. Covering your face is done to hide your identity when committing a crime. That is our cultural belief, and they need to respect it.\nHow can I trust anyone wearing 'a rag top & face covering; and off topic even a hoodie. \n\nSorry, but in a free country we do have the rules that allow us to ban certain items of clothing worn on the street. Men & women are not allowed to wear a T-shirt, shoes, and as simple belt exposing mother nature's reproductive organs. Why? We are a free country after all. It is because that manner of dress offends the majority. Na jabs offend the majority of Westerners in our culture, this new land they NEED to adopt to as we would need to adopt to their culture should we move to the Middle East.\n\nFrankly, if they can not adapt, they should be refused a VISA or work permit as they are a threat to our culture. France has every right to protect it's culture. Enough I have gone on and on. Thanks for reading my opinion.

Being covered is a great privilege and shows how Islam honors women more? ROLF! Just goes to show that there is more than one way to look at a situation. BUT. Imagine that she were to one day decide to go out to a beach in Iran wearing a g-string bikini. It would be a death wish on her part! How can people listen to this nonsense and take it seriously?

I don't get why would women wear such a dress. I know that a lot of women do it because of choice as well and a lot of them are forced to. However, if those who choose to accept the nakab are essentially indoctrinated from birth.